During the last twenty years (2000-2020) the intact forest landscapes extent within African, Caribbean and Pacific countries, decreased by 16% (237275km2).

However the protection of IFLs increased in the last two decades. Since 2000, around 100 conserved and protected areas were created in intact forests areas in ACP countries, increasing the percentage of IFL protected from 11% in 2000 to 26% in 2020.. Ethiopia has proposed six protected areas that will cover the total extent of IFL in the country. Republic of Congo increased IFL protection from 15,78% in 2000 to 67,07% in 2020.

Analysis performed by Simona Lippi

Reference:

Potapov, P., Hansen, M. C., Laestadius L., Turubanova S., Yaroshenko A., Thies C., Smith W., 
Zhuravleva I., Komarova A., Minnemeyer S., Esipova E. “The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of 
intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013” Science Advances, 2017; 3:e1600821

This dataset provides projections of global rainfall erosivity changes, a critical metric representing the erosive force of rainfall that drives worldwide soil and nutrient loss. These maps serve as essential inputs for global and regional soil erosion assessment models. The collection details the geographical distribution of projected erosivity changes across two primary periods: 2010–2050 and 2050–2070. To account for different climate trajectories, the dataset includes models for three distinct Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios for both timeframes: RCP 2.6 (stringent mitigation), RCP 4.5 (intermediate emissions), and RCP 8.5 (high emissions). By combining these temporal and climatic variables, users can evaluate and compare potential future soil erosion risks under varying degrees of global climate change.

Some extraordinary changes have occurred across the globe over the past decades regarding human habitation. Globally, between 1975 and 2015 built-up areas increased by approximately 250 %, while population increased by a factor of 1.8. The most considerable changes occurred in Africa where it has nearly quadrupled. The extent of built-up area poses a number of challenges to global sustainable development. As urban clusters expand, productive land and soil is sealed, and natural ecosystems are replaced by land use to support urban centres. This layer highlights the areas of concern for built-up related issues derived from the convergence of global evidence of human-environment interactions that can have land degradation consequences.

The data provided here are the result of a time-series analysis of carbon density change (in Mg/ha) between 2003-2014 spanning tropical America, Africa, and Asia (23.45 N lat.-23.45 S lat.). The original data is provided as two separate rasters representing (1) carbon density net gain and (2) carbon density net loss within each ~463 x 463 metre pixel, with only pixels exhibiting statistical significance at the 95% level being reported. The data here was re-projected from the its original MODIS sinusoidal projection to WGS84.

Malaria, a life-threatening disease transmitted by mosquitoes, affects millions of people worldwide. Treatment and prevention efforts such as insecticide-treated mosquito nets and rapid diagnostic tests significantly decreased the number of malaria cases in Africa. This layer displays the change in malaria rates (%) from 2000 to 2015 among children in Sub-Saharan Africa.

''Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) are defined as those with an unfragmented area of at least 500 km2 and which are minimally influenced by human economic activity''.(Thies et al. 2011) IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, and providing other ecosystem functions. Researchers, firstly, created a global IFL map using existing fine-scale maps and
a global coverage of high spatial resolution satellite imagery (Potapov et al. 2008). Moreover they assessed the distribution and dynamics of IFLs within the extent of present-day forest ecosystems tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2020. In this layer we show the reduction of the IFL extent for African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)countries that decreased by 16,6% since the year 2000. Countries that experienced the largest reduction in intact forest landscape area over the past two decades are Solomon Islands with 66,3 %, Central African Republic with 57% and Equatorial Guinea with 50,4%. Democratic Republic of the Congo still  has the highest proportion of intactness of ACP countries with 59,7Mha. IFL in Democratic Republic of the Congo has an extent of 64,3Mha as the 27,7% of its forest cover. 

An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km2. (Potapov et al.2017) Intact forests are complex and diverse ecosystems that if lost, are irreplaceable. Research shows that designating intact forest landscapes as protected areas has proven effective at limiting their fragmentation. Since 2000, around 100 conserved and protected areas were created in intact forests areas in ACP countries, increasing the percentage of IFL protected from 11% in 2000 to 26% in 2020.

Differences in countries in terms of IFL area reduction: Cuba has not experienced any reduction in IFLs and nowadays its intact forests are fully protected by PAs (544sqkm). At the contrary Angola still not has any kind of protection for its IFLs and experienced a reduction of 39,83% of its IFL (1160 sqkm) in country.The reduction of IFL area in ACP countries was higher outside PAs (19%) than within PAs (5%).Madagascar is the country where the reduction of IFL areas was very high inside protected areas (2420 sqkm). The IFL loss inside PAs has been more than 40% between 2000 and 2020. Central African Republic experienced 23% of reduction inside PAs (938,13 sqkm). This layer shows the percentage of IFLs protected by country

Analysis performed by Simona Lippi

At any given place on Earth, complex human-environment interactions are at play. They include differing rates and magnitudes of drivers (e.g. overgrazing, climate change, agricultural practices) and differing consequences in land degradation (e.g. soil erosion, changes in productivity, loss of biodiversity). The occurrence of multiple global change issues at a location suggests a potential for land degradation, at least in some form. This layer depicts where global change issues relevant to land degradation coincide at a global scale. It helps identifying local or regional areas of concern where land degradation processes may be underway.

Park managers in many countries across Africa need to monitor and understand their parks features and overall health. They can rely on the highly detailed land cover information offered by the Copernicus Hot Spot Land Cover Change Explorer for specific areas of interest –or hot spots. These areas were selected for their importance in biodiversity preservation (Protected Areas, Key Landscapes for Conservation...). For each land cover class (Natural vegetation, Wetlands, urbane areas, etc.), this layer shows which portions of the areas changed to another class over the period (2000-2019). For a more detailed analysis, compare the layer with the present landcover or refer to the online Explorer. The allows to monitor land cover and land cover change in high detail and make informed decisions based on spatial data.

Some areas in Africa represent spectacular, still viable examples of Africa’s wildlife and wild places. They are of such outstanding importance and value that they should be conserved at all costs and in principle forever. Those areas are referred to as Key Landscapes for Conservation or KLCs. A suitable network of KLCs has the potential to protect the well-known wildlife species within natural ecosystems and to stimulate rural economic growth.

Land cover is defined as the physical material at the surface of the earth, usually documented via the interpretation of earth observations. Common land cover types include trees, grass, bare ground, built up areas, water, etc. How well are different ecosystem types (as indicated by land cover) preserved and how strong are anthropogenic changes affecting their distribution in a given area? Human pressures are constantly increasing and it is important to monitor the consequences of the associated changes on the environment. This map shows the changes in land cover between 1995 and 2015.

From the new available dataset in GFW on tree cover change between 2000 and 2020, here we are displaying the net change in tree cover by percent for country.The net change in tree cover corresponds to the area of gross gain minus the area of gross loss to show the overall change (negative or positive). The attribute table provides also statistics on net change in tree cover  such stable forest or disturbed forest(in hectars).

This dataset is accessed through Global Forest Watch on 04/10/2022. www.globalforestwatch.org.

Potapov, P., Hansen, M.C., Pickens, A., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Turubanova, S., Zalles, V., Li, X., Khan, A., Stolle, F., Harris, N., Song, X-P., Baggett, A., Kommareddy, I., and Kommareddy, A. 2022. The Global 2000-2020 Land Cover and Land Use Change Dataset Derived From the Landsat Archive: First Results. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 13, April 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.856903; summarized by administrative area at WRI

The human imprint on the planet has a major impact on the functioning of the Earth system. Because the impact on the environment is closely intertwined with population dynamics, it is important to monitor and include these in the evaluation of land degradation. This layer displays the areas of concern for population change related issues derived from the convergence of global evidence of human-environment interactions that can lead to land degradation. It reflects the dynamics of increasing number of people in a certain area.

This layer is part of the World Altas of Desertification

• Cooling Absorption System;
• Refrigeration Absorption System;
• Binary ORC Power Plant;
• Flash Power Plant;
• Heat for Direct Use;
• Heat for High Temperature Heat Pump;

• base case scenario;
• upside scenario, modelling a better fluid flow;
• up up side, modelling both better fluid flow and higher underground temperatures.

<p>This spatial dataset contains the geographic boundaries and ecological evaluations of 45 Key Landscapes for Conservation and Development (KLCDs) across Sub-Saharan Africa. Building on the <a href="https://africa-knowledge-platform.ec.europa.eu/dataset/key-landscapes-c…; Key Landscapes for Conservation (KLCs) </a> identified in the EU report <a href="https://op.europa.eu/sl/publication-detail/-/publication/d76ac7eb-bc4a-…;“Larger than elephants”</a>, the NaturAfrica initiative is rolled out across these key biodiversity and development landscapes.</p>

<p>NaturAfrica's efforts are concentrated on ‘mega-landscapes’—biogeographical regions identified as crucial for both conservation and development. These regions encompass:</p>
<ul>
<li>The forest ecosystems of the Congo Basin;</li>
<li>Landscapes of transhumance pastoralists in North Cameroon, the Central African Republic, and Chad;</li>
<li>Guinean forests of West Africa;</li>
<li>Savannahs in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of West Africa;</li>
<li>Savannahs and watersheds of the East Africa rift;</li>
<li>Transfrontier conservation areas of Southern Africa.</li>
</ul>

<p>The layer was developed to support the prioritization of intervention areas for the second phase of this initiative, which combines conservation with sustainable job creation. It provides a spatially explicit characterization of ecological value across these landscapes, evaluated and attributed based on five core ecological and environmental dimensions:</p>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Threatened Species Richness:</span> Concentration and diversity of threatened species.</li>
<li><span class="label">Species Endemicity:</span> Presence of endemic species unique to the specific geographic region.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecosystem Integrity:</span> The integrity of protected and conserved areas, accounting for degrees of human modification and habitat fragmentation.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecological Connectivity:</span> The degree of connectivity and spatial linkages between protected and conserved areas.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecosystem Services:</span> Provisioning and regulating services, with a specific focus on carbon storage and water services.</li>
</ul>

<strong>Purpose</strong>
<p>The layer was created to inform the EC Directorate General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) and policymakers in selecting and prioritizing funding intervention areas based on specific targets (e.g., species conservation, connectivity, or water security) within different biogeographical regions. It serves as a spatial decision-support tool to align with the European Green Deal and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.</p>

<strong>Geographic Extent</strong>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Region:</span> Sub-Saharan Africa</li>
<li><span class="label">Coverage:</span> 45 distinct Key Landscapes for Conservation and Development (KLCDs)</li>
</ul>

<strong>Keywords</strong>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Thematic:</span> Biodiversity Conservation, NaturAfrica, Ecosystem Services, Protected Areas, Habitat Connectivity, Species Endemicity, European Green Deal, Ecosystem Integrity, Transfrontier Conservation, Mega-landscapes.</li>
<li><span class="label">Spatial:</span> Sub-Saharan Africa, Congo Basin, West Africa, East Africa, Southern Africa, Sudano-Sahelian zone.</li>
</ul>

<strong>Lineage / Data Source</strong>
<p>This dataset is derived from the <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC145021"&gt; technical assessment conducted for the European Commission Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD) </a>.</p>