Main navigation
User account menu
Language
Biodiversity hotspots are the Earth’s most biologically rich—yet heavily threatened—terrestrial regions. These are regions where success in conserving species can have an enormous impact in securing our global biodiversity. To qualify as a biodiversity hotspot, an area must meet two strict criteria: it must contain at least 1,500 species of vascular plants found nowhere else on Earth (known as "endemic" species), and it must have lost at least 70% of its primary native vegetation. 36 regions are identified as hotspots by Conservation International and partners, 9 of which lay (partially or fully) in Africa. This dataset shows their location.
The Biodiversity Intactness Index shows the modelled average abundance of originally-present species in a grid cell, as a percentage, relative to their abundance in an intact ecosystem. Originally available for year 2015, the data is now available in a time series covering the period 2000-2015 - here we provide a bi-decade subset of the index.
Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana are the main largest producers of cocoa in the world. However, the cultivation of this crop has led to the loss of vast tracts of forest areas in both countries. Efficient and accurate methods for remotely identifying cocoa farms are essential for the implementation of sustainable cocoa practices and the periodic and effective monitoring of forests. This map, generated using Random Forest image classification, shows the 2019 distribution of cocoa farms in both countries. The estimated area for cocoa is 4.8Mha for Cote d'Ivoire and 2.3Mha for Ghana.
An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km2. (Potapov et al.2017) Intact forests are complex and diverse ecosystems that if lost, are irreplaceable. Research shows that designating intact forest landscapes as protected areas has proven effective at limiting their fragmentation. Since 2000, around 100 conserved and protected areas were created in intact forests areas in ACP countries, increasing the percentage of IFL protected from 11% in 2000 to 26% in 2020.
Differences in countries in terms of IFL area reduction: Cuba has not experienced any reduction in IFLs and nowadays its intact forests are fully protected by PAs (544sqkm). At the contrary Angola still not has any kind of protection for its IFLs and experienced a reduction of 39,83% of its IFL (1160 sqkm) in country.The reduction of IFL area in ACP countries was higher outside PAs (19%) than within PAs (5%).Madagascar is the country where the reduction of IFL areas was very high inside protected areas (2420 sqkm). The IFL loss inside PAs has been more than 40% between 2000 and 2020. Central African Republic experienced 23% of reduction inside PAs (938,13 sqkm). This layer shows the percentage of IFLs protected by country
| Country | IFL protected 2020 (sqkm) | IFL unprotected 2020 (sqkm) | Percentage of IFL protected 2020 | Percentage of IFL unprotected 2020 |
| Angola | 0.00 | 1752.85 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| Belize | 3310.17 | 288.36 | 91.99 | 8.01 |
| Cameroon | 19181.16 | 12787.52 | 60.00 | 40.00 |
| Central African Republic | 3070.21 | 656.90 | 82.37 | 17.62 |
| Congo | 67218.88 | 32997.23 | 67.07 | 32.93 |
| Cote d'Ivoire | 3759.21 | 1.27 | 99.97 | 0.03 |
| Cuba | 544.02 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 131588.22 | 465687.18 | 22.03 | 77.97 |
| Dominican Republic | 553.86 | 11.03 | 98.05 | 1.95 |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1549.39 | 555.44 | 73.61 | 26.39 |
| Ethiopia | 0 | 3233.7 | 0 | 100 |
| Gabon | 22692.90 | 53598.80 | 29.74 | 70.26 |
| Guyana | 15545.93 | 101781.93 | 13.25 | 86.75 |
| Liberia | 1573.69 | 1306.95 | 54.63 | 45.37 |
| Madagascar | 9931.34 | 867.74 | 91.96 | 8.04 |
| Nigeria | 2211.75 | 204.39 | 91.54 | 8.46 |
| Papua New Guinea | 5863.48 | 121258.17 | 4.61 | 95.39 |
| Samoa | 93.13 | 550.03 | 14.48 | 85.52 |
| Solomon Islands | 60.11 | 2569.93 | 2.29 | 97.71 |
| Suriname | 17304.85 | 75269.36 | 18.69 | 81.31 |
| Uganda | 945.21 | 16.84 | 98.25 | 1.75 |
| United Republic of Tanzania | 3627.46 | 168.85 | 95.55 | 4.45 |
| Vanuatu | 13.24 | 675.08 | 1.92 | 98.08 |
Analysis performed by Simona Lippi
In Sub-Saharan Africa, medium- and low-voltage data are often non-existent, uncompleted, or unavailable. This is a challenge for practitioners working on the electricity access agenda, power sector resilience or climate change adaptation. This layer presents the spatial extent of the existing and planned electricity grid (high, medium, low voltage level) compiled using multiple sources that enumerate elements of the existing transmission and distribution network.
Mapping ongoing project activities in the field of conservation in protected areas is essential to identify the various actors and to identify the areas where information and actors are scarce. The aim is to better understand who is funding what and where, with a view to improve decision-making on biodiversity conservation. This map provides the geolocation of all sites that have received funding in the frame of a biodiversity conservation project -or an activity within a project- within approx. the last 20 years. It specifies whether the site is protected or not. One project usually includes several sites.
In 2020, a group of researchers carried out analysis to examine the importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for preserving Intact Forest Landscapes.(Fa et al.2020)They used geospatial data on the extent of Indigenous Peoples’ lands reported by Garnett et al. (2018), and Geospatial data for IFLs were sourced from the Intact Forest Landscapes website (www.intactforests.org) for the years 2000, 2013, and 2016 (Potapov et al. 2017)In the paper they have shown that the proportion of Indigenous Peoples’ lands mapped as IFLs was considerably higher (10.9%) than the proportion of other lands (defined here as all land outside Indigenous Peoples’ lands) mapped as IFLs (6.8%).
In this map we reported the percentage of Intact Forest Lansdcapes reduction in Indigenous People Lands for the period 2000-2016. IN the table we reported also the percentage of IFLs reduction in other lands. To explore more IFLs conservation strategies for African, Caribbean and Pacific countries you can check BIOPAMA Geonode Layers
Sources:
Fa JE, Watson JE, Leiper I, Potapov P, Evans TD, Burgess ND, Molnár Z, Fernández‐Llamazares Á, Duncan T, Wang S, Austin BJ. Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2020 Apr;18(3):135-4
Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are the most important places in the world for species and their habitats. Faced with a global environmental crisis we need to focus our collective efforts on conserving the places that matter most. The KBA Programme supports the identification, mapping, monitoring and conservation of KBAs to help safeguard the most critical sites for nature on our planet – from rainforests to reefs, mountains to marshes, deserts to grasslands and to the deepest parts of the oceans. By providing the precise location of places that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity, KBAs can accelerate efforts to reverse the loss of nature, by ensuring conservation efforts are focussed in the places that matter most, and by enabling entities that may have negative impacts on nature to avoid or reduce those impacts in the places they would be most damaging. This layer shows the location of the KBAs, identified and mapped by the KBA partnership.
Adult literacy rate is the percentage of people ages 15 and above who can both read and write with understanding a short simple statement about their everyday life. Literacy statistics for most countries cover the population ages 15 and older, but some include younger ages or are confined to age ranges that tend to inflate literacy rates. The youth literacy rate for ages 15-24 reflects recent progress in education. It measures the accumulated outcomes of primary education over the previous 10 years or so by indicating the proportion of the population who have passed through the primary education system and acquired basic literacy and numeracy skills.
From the new available dataset in GFW on tree cover change between 2000 and 2020, here we are displaying the net change in tree cover by percent for country.The net change in tree cover corresponds to the area of gross gain minus the area of gross loss to show the overall change (negative or positive). The attribute table provides also statistics on net change in tree cover such stable forest or disturbed forest(in hectars).
This dataset is accessed through Global Forest Watch on 04/10/2022. www.globalforestwatch.org.
Potapov, P., Hansen, M.C., Pickens, A., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Turubanova, S., Zalles, V., Li, X., Khan, A., Stolle, F., Harris, N., Song, X-P., Baggett, A., Kommareddy, I., and Kommareddy, A. 2022. The Global 2000-2020 Land Cover and Land Use Change Dataset Derived From the Landsat Archive: First Results. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 13, April 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.856903; summarized by administrative area at WRI
Net official development assistance (ODA) is government aid designed to promote the economic development and welfare of developing countries. Aid may be provided bilaterally, from donor to recipient, or channelled through a multilateral development agency such as the United Nations or the World Bank. Net official aid (OA) refers to aid flows from official donors to more advanced (developing) countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. This map shows the aggregated figure (sum of ODA and OA) for African countries. Data are in current U.S. dollars.
This map provides a spatially explicit characterization of 47 terrestrial habitat types, as defined in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) habitat classification scheme, which is widely used in ecological analyses, including for quantifying species’ Area of Habitat. The map broadens our understanding of habitats globally, assist in constructing area of habitat refinements, and are relevant for broad-scale ecological studies and future IUCN Red List assessments. Periodic updates are planned as better or more recent data becomes available.
This map provides a spatially explicit characterization of 47 terrestrial habitat types, as defined in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) habitat classification scheme, which is widely used in ecological analyses, including for quantifying species’ Area of Habitat. The map broadens our understanding of habitats globally, assist in constructing area of habitat refinements, and are relevant for broad-scale ecological studies and future IUCN Red List assessments. Periodic updates are planned as better or more recent data becomes available.
This dataset shows Regional locations and general geologic setting of known deposits of major nonfuel mineral commodities in Africa
This dataset compiles geophysical models detailing the thickness of the Earth's outer layers, ranging from surface sedimentary basins down to the base of the lithosphere. The collection serves a dual purpose: it provides broad, global baseline data for sediment distribution, while also offering high-resolution, integrated regional models specifically focused on the African plate.
Dataset Contents:
I. Global Baselines
II. African Regional Models
These layers are part of the Geothermal Atlas for Africa developed within the LEAP-RE project
The current version of the GDW database (version 1.0) aims to catalogue all types of anthropogenic instream barriers. While initial mapping efforts prioritize major dams that form reservoirs, as well as run-of-river barriers on larger rivers where more information is readily available, the dataset comprises two distinct but interconnected spatial layers:
<p>This spatial dataset contains the geographic boundaries and ecological evaluations of 45 Key Landscapes for Conservation and Development (KLCDs) across Sub-Saharan Africa. Building on the <a href="https://africa-knowledge-platform.ec.europa.eu/dataset/key-landscapes-c…; Key Landscapes for Conservation (KLCs) </a> identified in the EU report <a href="https://op.europa.eu/sl/publication-detail/-/publication/d76ac7eb-bc4a-…;“Larger than elephants”</a>, the NaturAfrica initiative is rolled out across these key biodiversity and development landscapes.</p>
<p>NaturAfrica's efforts are concentrated on ‘mega-landscapes’—biogeographical regions identified as crucial for both conservation and development. These regions encompass:</p>
<ul>
<li>The forest ecosystems of the Congo Basin;</li>
<li>Landscapes of transhumance pastoralists in North Cameroon, the Central African Republic, and Chad;</li>
<li>Guinean forests of West Africa;</li>
<li>Savannahs in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of West Africa;</li>
<li>Savannahs and watersheds of the East Africa rift;</li>
<li>Transfrontier conservation areas of Southern Africa.</li>
</ul>
<p>The layer was developed to support the prioritization of intervention areas for the second phase of this initiative, which combines conservation with sustainable job creation. It provides a spatially explicit characterization of ecological value across these landscapes, evaluated and attributed based on five core ecological and environmental dimensions:</p>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Threatened Species Richness:</span> Concentration and diversity of threatened species.</li>
<li><span class="label">Species Endemicity:</span> Presence of endemic species unique to the specific geographic region.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecosystem Integrity:</span> The integrity of protected and conserved areas, accounting for degrees of human modification and habitat fragmentation.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecological Connectivity:</span> The degree of connectivity and spatial linkages between protected and conserved areas.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecosystem Services:</span> Provisioning and regulating services, with a specific focus on carbon storage and water services.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Purpose</strong>
<p>The layer was created to inform the EC Directorate General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) and policymakers in selecting and prioritizing funding intervention areas based on specific targets (e.g., species conservation, connectivity, or water security) within different biogeographical regions. It serves as a spatial decision-support tool to align with the European Green Deal and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.</p>
<strong>Geographic Extent</strong>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Region:</span> Sub-Saharan Africa</li>
<li><span class="label">Coverage:</span> 45 distinct Key Landscapes for Conservation and Development (KLCDs)</li>
</ul>
<strong>Keywords</strong>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Thematic:</span> Biodiversity Conservation, NaturAfrica, Ecosystem Services, Protected Areas, Habitat Connectivity, Species Endemicity, European Green Deal, Ecosystem Integrity, Transfrontier Conservation, Mega-landscapes.</li>
<li><span class="label">Spatial:</span> Sub-Saharan Africa, Congo Basin, West Africa, East Africa, Southern Africa, Sudano-Sahelian zone.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Lineage / Data Source</strong>
<p>This dataset is derived from the <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC145021"> technical assessment conducted for the European Commission Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD) </a>.</p>
Chlorophyll-a concentrations (Chla) are an indicator of phytoplankton abundance and biomass in open waters. They can be an effective measure of trophic status and are commonly used to measure water quality. This layer compares the Chla value from the last full month with the long-term mean Chla. A positive anomaly (warm colours) means the monthly Chla is higher than the long-term average for that month; a negative anomaly (cool colours) means it is lower than the average.