Main navigation
User account menu
Language
''Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) are defined as those with an unfragmented area of at least 500 km2 and which are minimally influenced by human economic activity''.(Thies et al. 2011) IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, and providing other ecosystem functions. Researchers, firstly, created a global IFL map using existing fine-scale maps and
a global coverage of high spatial resolution satellite imagery (Potapov et al. 2008). Moreover they assessed the distribution and dynamics of IFLs within the extent of present-day forest ecosystems tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2020. In this layer we show the reduction of the IFL extent for African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)countries that decreased by 16,6% since the year 2000. Countries that experienced the largest reduction in intact forest landscape area over the past two decades are Solomon Islands with 66,3 %, Central African Republic with 57% and Equatorial Guinea with 50,4%. Democratic Republic of the Congo still has the highest proportion of intactness of ACP countries with 59,7Mha. IFL in Democratic Republic of the Congo has an extent of 64,3Mha as the 27,7% of its forest cover.
| Country | IFL Area in 2000 (sqkm) | IFL Area in 2020 (sqkm) | Percentage of IFL reduction |
| Angola | 2913.32 | 1752.85 | 39.83 |
| Belize | 4275.28 | 3598.44 | 15.83 |
| Cote d'Ivoire | 4558.78 | 3760.48 | 17.51 |
| Cameroon | 52752.96 | 31968.77 | 39.40 |
| Central African Republic | 8695.96 | 3727.14 | 57.14 |
| Congo | 138699.28 | 100215.44 | 27.75 |
| Cuba | 544.02 | 544.02 | 0.00 |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 643864.37 | 597275.75 | 7.24 |
| Dominican Republic | 795.21 | 564.89 | 28.96 |
| Equatorial Guinea | 4249.57 | 2104.83 | 50.47 |
| Ethiopia | 3671.63 | 3233.76 | 11.93 |
| Gabon | 108838.30 | 76291.78 | 29.90 |
| Guyana | 144296.97 | 117327.95 | 18.69 |
| Liberia | 4748.74 | 2880.65 | 39.34 |
| Madagascar | 17240.16 | 10799.08 | 37.36 |
| Nigeria | 2959.07 | 2416.10 | 18.35 |
| Papua New Guinea | 159523.52 | 127121.71 | 20.31 |
| Samoa | 650.86 | 643.16 | 1.18 |
| Solomon Islands | 7820.33 | 2630.05 | 66.37 |
| Suriname | 107282.59 | 92574.26 | 13.71 |
| Uganda | 984.66 | 962.06 | 2.30 |
| United Republic of Tanzania | 4081.92 | 3796.32 | 7.00 |
| Vanuatu | 706.13 | 688.33 | 2.52 |
An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km2. (Potapov et al.2017) Intact forests are complex and diverse ecosystems that if lost, are irreplaceable. Research shows that designating intact forest landscapes as protected areas has proven effective at limiting their fragmentation. Since 2000, around 100 conserved and protected areas were created in intact forests areas in ACP countries, increasing the percentage of IFL protected from 11% in 2000 to 26% in 2020.
Differences in countries in terms of IFL area reduction: Cuba has not experienced any reduction in IFLs and nowadays its intact forests are fully protected by PAs (544sqkm). At the contrary Angola still not has any kind of protection for its IFLs and experienced a reduction of 39,83% of its IFL (1160 sqkm) in country.The reduction of IFL area in ACP countries was higher outside PAs (19%) than within PAs (5%).Madagascar is the country where the reduction of IFL areas was very high inside protected areas (2420 sqkm). The IFL loss inside PAs has been more than 40% between 2000 and 2020. Central African Republic experienced 23% of reduction inside PAs (938,13 sqkm). This layer shows the percentage of IFLs protected by country
| Country | IFL protected 2020 (sqkm) | IFL unprotected 2020 (sqkm) | Percentage of IFL protected 2020 | Percentage of IFL unprotected 2020 |
| Angola | 0.00 | 1752.85 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
| Belize | 3310.17 | 288.36 | 91.99 | 8.01 |
| Cameroon | 19181.16 | 12787.52 | 60.00 | 40.00 |
| Central African Republic | 3070.21 | 656.90 | 82.37 | 17.62 |
| Congo | 67218.88 | 32997.23 | 67.07 | 32.93 |
| Cote d'Ivoire | 3759.21 | 1.27 | 99.97 | 0.03 |
| Cuba | 544.02 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 131588.22 | 465687.18 | 22.03 | 77.97 |
| Dominican Republic | 553.86 | 11.03 | 98.05 | 1.95 |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1549.39 | 555.44 | 73.61 | 26.39 |
| Ethiopia | 0 | 3233.7 | 0 | 100 |
| Gabon | 22692.90 | 53598.80 | 29.74 | 70.26 |
| Guyana | 15545.93 | 101781.93 | 13.25 | 86.75 |
| Liberia | 1573.69 | 1306.95 | 54.63 | 45.37 |
| Madagascar | 9931.34 | 867.74 | 91.96 | 8.04 |
| Nigeria | 2211.75 | 204.39 | 91.54 | 8.46 |
| Papua New Guinea | 5863.48 | 121258.17 | 4.61 | 95.39 |
| Samoa | 93.13 | 550.03 | 14.48 | 85.52 |
| Solomon Islands | 60.11 | 2569.93 | 2.29 | 97.71 |
| Suriname | 17304.85 | 75269.36 | 18.69 | 81.31 |
| Uganda | 945.21 | 16.84 | 98.25 | 1.75 |
| United Republic of Tanzania | 3627.46 | 168.85 | 95.55 | 4.45 |
| Vanuatu | 13.24 | 675.08 | 1.92 | 98.08 |
Analysis performed by Simona Lippi
In 2020, a group of researchers carried out analysis to examine the importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for preserving Intact Forest Landscapes.(Fa et al.2020)They used geospatial data on the extent of Indigenous Peoples’ lands reported by Garnett et al. (2018), and Geospatial data for IFLs were sourced from the Intact Forest Landscapes website (www.intactforests.org) for the years 2000, 2013, and 2016 (Potapov et al. 2017)In the paper they have shown that the proportion of Indigenous Peoples’ lands mapped as IFLs was considerably higher (10.9%) than the proportion of other lands (defined here as all land outside Indigenous Peoples’ lands) mapped as IFLs (6.8%).
In this map we reported the percentage of Intact Forest Lansdcapes reduction in Indigenous People Lands for the period 2000-2016. IN the table we reported also the percentage of IFLs reduction in other lands. To explore more IFLs conservation strategies for African, Caribbean and Pacific countries you can check BIOPAMA Geonode Layers
Sources:
Fa JE, Watson JE, Leiper I, Potapov P, Evans TD, Burgess ND, Molnár Z, Fernández‐Llamazares Á, Duncan T, Wang S, Austin BJ. Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2020 Apr;18(3):135-4
Tropical moist forests have a huge environmental value. They play an important role in biodiversity conservation, terrestrial carbon cycle, hydrological regimes, indigenous population subsistence and human health (1-5). They are increasingly recognized as an essential element of any strategy to mitigate climate change. Accurate characterization of the tropical moist forests changes is needed to support conservation policies and to better quantify their contribution to global carbon fluxes. This map shows the coverage of undisturbed tropical moist forests remaining at the end of the year 2019.
The Biodiversity Intactness Index shows the modelled average abundance of originally-present species in a grid cell, as a percentage, relative to their abundance in an intact ecosystem. Originally available for year 2015, the data is now available in a time series covering the period 2000-2015 - here we provide a bi-decade subset of the index.
The Copernicus Global Land Service - Burnt Area products depict burn scars, surfaces which have been sufficiently affected by fire to display significant changes in the vegetation cover (destruction of dry material, reduction or loss of green material) and in the ground surface (temporarily darker because of ash). The monthly products are available at global scale in the spatial resolution of 300 m and cover the period from January 2019 to April 2022. The pixel bears the value of the day of the year in which the burn scars were visible while, if selected for mapping in this platform, the dataset shows the burn scars detected in the selected month.
This dataset is an index that estimates the relative value provided by coral reefs that protect coastlines through reduction of wave height and wave energy. The value as of 2014 is modelled as a function of exposed populations and infrastructure that received some level of protection from coastal and barrier reefs, and is described in relative terms, classified by decile (i.e., grouped into the most valuable ten percent of reefs for protection, the second-most valuable tenth of reefs, etc.). It was calculated at 1 kilometre (km) resolution globally, encompassing all countries and territories containing coral reefs.
Poverty affects billions of people around the globe. On a daily basis, they face low wages and substandard health, education, and living standards. Because of this, poverty must be understood and approached as a multidimensional issue. The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) acknowledges that poverty has many faces. The second dimension in the MIP is the Education dimension. This includes years of schooling and child school attendance. This map shows the percentage contribution of the education dimension to overall poverty. The lower percentages are shown in darker blues while the higher percentages are shown as brighter, lighter blues.
This layer provides the Effective Leaf Area Index (LAIe), a critical parameter for modeling evapotranspiration and carbon fluxes between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Monitoring the distribution and seasonal evolution of LAI is essential for assessing vegetation health and ecosystem dynamics across Africa.
The Effective Leaf Area Index is a quantitative measure of the amount of live green leaf material present per unit ground surface. Unlike "True LAI," which represents the total physical leaf area, the Effective LAI is derived from canopy gap fraction measurements and assumes a random distribution of foliage. It is a non-dimensional quantity, typically expressed in units of m²/m².
This dataset is widely utilized in agro-meteorology, biogeochemical modeling, and General Circulation Models (GCMs) to parameterize vegetation cover and its complex interactions with the atmosphere.
This layer is part of the Earth Land Information System (ELIS).
This layer presents the Effective Leaf Area Index (LAIe) Anomalies, representing the deviation of current vegetation density from the historical average. Monitoring the change of LAI is essential for assessing the evolution of the vegetation over Africa.
LAI anomalies are calculated relative to the average values between 2003 and 2010. The dataset captures LAI anomalies every 10 days, reflecting the high variability and rapid changes in African vegetation cover. Increases in temperature and precipitation deficits are the primary drivers for negative anomalies (reduced foliage density). Beyond climatic factors, human activities or animal grazing may also locally impact the state and density of leaves.
This layer is part of the a href="https://fapar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/_www/index.php">Earth Land Information System (ELIS).
Forest canopy height measures the average height of the tree canopy in 2012. This dataset is created by integrating broadscale optical remotely sensed data at 30-metre spatial resolution with on-the-ground measurements.
The Global Gridded Relative Deprivation Index (GRDI) characterizes the relative levels of multidimensional deprivation and poverty, where a value of 100 represents the highest level of deprivation and a value of 0 the lowest. GRDI is built from sociodemographic and satellite data inputs that were spatially harmonized, indexed, and weighted into six main components to produce the final GRDI layer.
The INFORM Risk Index 2021 is a composite model structured into a hierarchy of dimensions, categories, and components. All scores are normalized on a scale of 0 to 10 (10 being the highest risk).
Below is the clear breakdown of the index's architecture based on your descriptions:
The top-level score representing a country's overall risk of humanitarian crisis. It is used to assign countries into Risk Classes:
This dimension measures the predisposition of a population to be affected by a hazard based on economic, political, and social characteristics.
Sub-Index: Socio-Economic Vulnerability
An aggregate index covering three main components of systemic instability:
Sub-Index: Vulnerable Groups
Captures social groups with limited access to care and heightened susceptibility:
This dimension measures the ability of a country to manage and recover from disasters through its infrastructure and government effort.
Sub-Index: Institutional Capacity
Measures the "soft" infrastructure of a country's disaster management:
Sub-Index: Infrastructure
Measures the "hard" assets and systems available during a crisis:
The International Wealth Index is an asset-based wealth index that runs from 0 (no assets) to 100 (all assets) and is comparable across place and time. The lower the level of the Index, the greater the potential of electricity access to reduce poverty and foster development.
The EC JRC global map of forest cover provides a spatially explicit representation of forest presence and absence for the year 2020 at 10m spatial resolution.
The year 2020 corresponds to the cut-off date of the Regulation from the European Union "on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation" (EUDR, Regulation (EU) 2023/1115). In the context of the EUDR, the global forest cover map can be used as a non-mandatory, non-exclusive, and not legally binding source of information. Further information about the map and its use can be found on the EU Observatory on Deforestation and Forest Degradation (EUFO) in the section on Frequently Asked Questions.
Forest means land spanning more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10%, or trees able to reach those thresholds in situ, excluding land that is predominantly under agricultural or urban land use. Agricultural use means the use of land for the purpose of agriculture, including for agricultural plantations (i.e. tree stands in agricultural production systems such as fruit tree plantations, oil palm plantations, olive orchards and agroforestry systems) and set- aside agricultural areas, and for rearing livestock. All plantations of relevant commodities other than wood, that is cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya, are excluded from the forest definition.
The global map of forest cover was created by combining available global datasets (wall-to-wall or global in their scope) on tree cover, tree height, land cover and land use into a single harmonized globally-consistent representation of where forests existed in 2020.
The workflow consisted in first mapping the global maximum extent of tree cover circa the year 2020 from the combination of ESA World Cover 2020 and 2021, WRI Tropical Tree Cover 2020, UMD Global land cover and land use 2019, Global Mangrove Watch 2020, and JRC Tropical Moist Forest 2020 datasets. In the second step, a series of overlays and decision rules were applied to reduce this maximum extent of tree cover and align it with the Forest definition using datasets covering cropland and commodity expansion (ESA World Cereal, UMD Global land cover and land use 2019, UMD Global Cropland Expansion, High-resolution global map of smallholder and industrial oil palm plantations, and WRI Spatial Database of Planted Trees), land use change (UMD global forest cover loss, JRC Tropical Moist Forest, IIASA Global Forest Management), built-up (JRC Global Human Settlement), and water (JRC Global Surface Water).
The detailed mapping approach will be described in a separate technical report expected to be released by March 2024. The accuracy of this map has not been yet assessed but will be reported as soon as available.
Please also refer to the list of known issues and to the JRC Data Catalogue entry.
Some areas in Africa represent spectacular, still viable examples of Africa’s wildlife and wild places. They are of such outstanding importance and value that they should be conserved at all costs and in principle forever. Those areas are referred to as Key Landscapes for Conservation or KLCs. A suitable network of KLCs has the potential to protect the well-known wildlife species within natural ecosystems and to stimulate rural economic growth.
<p>This spatial dataset contains the geographic boundaries and ecological evaluations of 45 Key Landscapes for Conservation and Development (KLCDs) across Sub-Saharan Africa. Building on the <a href="https://africa-knowledge-platform.ec.europa.eu/dataset/key-landscapes-c…; Key Landscapes for Conservation (KLCs) </a> identified in the EU report <a href="https://op.europa.eu/sl/publication-detail/-/publication/d76ac7eb-bc4a-…;“Larger than elephants”</a>, the NaturAfrica initiative is rolled out across these key biodiversity and development landscapes.</p>
<p>NaturAfrica's efforts are concentrated on ‘mega-landscapes’—biogeographical regions identified as crucial for both conservation and development. These regions encompass:</p>
<ul>
<li>The forest ecosystems of the Congo Basin;</li>
<li>Landscapes of transhumance pastoralists in North Cameroon, the Central African Republic, and Chad;</li>
<li>Guinean forests of West Africa;</li>
<li>Savannahs in the Sudano-Sahelian zone of West Africa;</li>
<li>Savannahs and watersheds of the East Africa rift;</li>
<li>Transfrontier conservation areas of Southern Africa.</li>
</ul>
<p>The layer was developed to support the prioritization of intervention areas for the second phase of this initiative, which combines conservation with sustainable job creation. It provides a spatially explicit characterization of ecological value across these landscapes, evaluated and attributed based on five core ecological and environmental dimensions:</p>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Threatened Species Richness:</span> Concentration and diversity of threatened species.</li>
<li><span class="label">Species Endemicity:</span> Presence of endemic species unique to the specific geographic region.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecosystem Integrity:</span> The integrity of protected and conserved areas, accounting for degrees of human modification and habitat fragmentation.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecological Connectivity:</span> The degree of connectivity and spatial linkages between protected and conserved areas.</li>
<li><span class="label">Ecosystem Services:</span> Provisioning and regulating services, with a specific focus on carbon storage and water services.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Purpose</strong>
<p>The layer was created to inform the EC Directorate General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) and policymakers in selecting and prioritizing funding intervention areas based on specific targets (e.g., species conservation, connectivity, or water security) within different biogeographical regions. It serves as a spatial decision-support tool to align with the European Green Deal and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.</p>
<strong>Geographic Extent</strong>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Region:</span> Sub-Saharan Africa</li>
<li><span class="label">Coverage:</span> 45 distinct Key Landscapes for Conservation and Development (KLCDs)</li>
</ul>
<strong>Keywords</strong>
<ul>
<li><span class="label">Thematic:</span> Biodiversity Conservation, NaturAfrica, Ecosystem Services, Protected Areas, Habitat Connectivity, Species Endemicity, European Green Deal, Ecosystem Integrity, Transfrontier Conservation, Mega-landscapes.</li>
<li><span class="label">Spatial:</span> Sub-Saharan Africa, Congo Basin, West Africa, East Africa, Southern Africa, Sudano-Sahelian zone.</li>
</ul>
<strong>Lineage / Data Source</strong>
<p>This dataset is derived from the <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC145021"> technical assessment conducted for the European Commission Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD) </a>.</p>
Poverty affects billions of people around the globe. On a daily basis, they face low wages and substandard health, education, and living standards. Because of this, poverty must be understood and approached as a multidimensional issue. The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) acknowledges that poverty has many faces. The third and last dimension in the MPI is the Living Standard dimension. This includes access to electricity, improved sanitation services and safe drinking water, flooring, cooking fuel, and assets ownership. This map shows the percentage contribution of the Living Standards Dimension to the overall poverty index. The lower percentages are shown in darker greens while the higher percentages are shown as brighter, lighter greens.
The Rule of Law Index, generated by the World Justice Project, illustrates the perceived adherence to the Rule of Law per country. Rule of law is defined here as a durable system of laws, institutions, norms, and community commitment that delivers accountability, just laws, open government, and accessible justice. These principles are measured across eight factors:
The Rule of Law Index aggregate the scores across factors. A high ranking (a low numerical rank) means that perceived adherence to the Rule of Law is higher. 0=weakest, 1=strongest.
This dataset is part of the LEAP-RE project collection. For more information visit https://www.leap-re.eu/
Droughts affect millions of people in the world each year and have long-lasting socioeconomic impacts. They can occur over most parts of the world, even in wet and humid regions, and can profoundly impact agriculture, basic household welfare, tourism, ecosystems and the services they provide. The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is the most commonly used indicator worldwide for detecting and characterizing meteorological droughts, which are prolonged periods of less than average rainfall in a given region. It measures precipitation anomalies at a given location, based on a comparison of observed total precipitation amounts for an accumulation period of interest (in this case, 3 months), with the long-term rainfall record for that period. SPI values below ‒1.0 indicate rainfall deficits (drier than normal – yellow to red), while SPI values above 1.0 indicate excess rainfall (wetter than normal – purple to blue). The lower the SPI, the more intense is the drought. The layer show the SPI-3 from the month second to last and is updated monthly.
Tropical moist forests have a huge environmental value. They play an important role in biodiversity conservation, terrestrial carbon cycle, hydrological regimes, indigenous population subsistence and human health (1-5). They are increasingly recognized as an essential element of any strategy to mitigate climate change. Deforestation, and degradation compromise the functioning of tropical forests as an ecosystem, lead to biodiversity loss and reduced carbon storage capacity. Deforestation and fragmentation are increasing the risk of virus disease outbreaks. This map shows where deforestation occurred in the last three decades (between 1982 and 2020) and the year when the forest cover has been deforested for the first time (followed or not by a regrowth).
Tropical moist forests have a huge environmental value. They play an important role in biodiversity conservation, terrestrial carbon cycle, hydrological regimes, indigenous population subsistence and human health (1-5). They are increasingly recognized as an essential element of any strategy to mitigate climate change. Deforestation, and degradation compromise the functioning of tropical forests as an ecosystem, lead to biodiversity loss and reduced carbon storage capacity. Deforestation and fragmentation are increasing the risk of virus disease outbreaks. This map shows where degradation occurred in the last three decades (between 1982 and 2020) and the year when the forest has been degraded for the first time (and remained degraded up to 2020).
Tropical moist forests have a huge environmental value. They play an important role in biodiversity conservation, terrestrial carbon cycle, hydrological regimes, indigenous population subsistence and human health (1-5). They are increasingly recognized as an essential element of any strategy to mitigate climate change. Accurate characterization of the tropical moist forests changes is needed to support conservation policies and to better quantify their contribution to global carbon fluxes. The transition map captures the dynamics of changes in tropical moist forests between the initial observation period (1990) and the end of the year 2020.
Where are the best places to spot the most requested wildlife-watching species? This grid layer presents a richness index of top wildlife watching species/groups, including rhinos, elephants, lions, leopards, buffalos, giraffes, lowland and mountain gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, sifakas, ringtails, aye-aye, mouse lemurs and colobus.
This dataset maps regions across Africa with high geothermal energy exploration potential, identifying areas where further research and investment are most likely to yield significant returns. The mapping represents a synthesis of the Indicator Analysis performed by TNO (Hofstra, 2023), specifically selecting the most and least favorable technical outcomes under the assumption of a clay-poor sandstone (CP) compaction model.
To ensure structural robustness and account for geological uncertainty, the indicator results have been projected onto four distinct geological basin models:
Key Indicators & Methodology
The favorable results displayed in these maps are derived from a multi-criteria evaluation which includes:
This layer is part of the Geothermal Atlas for Africa developed within the LEAP-RE project.
Forests worldwide are in a state of flux, with accelerating losses in some regions and gains in others. Given the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services, quantification of global forest extent and change is needed. This map displays the tree cover in the year 2000. Tree cover is defined as canopy closure for all vegetation taller than 5m in height and is expressed as a percentage per output grid cell, in the range 0–100.
Forests worldwide are in a state of flux, with accelerating losses in some regions and gains in others. Given the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services, quantification of global forest extent and change is needed. This map displays the forest gain during the period 2000–2018. Forest gain is defined as the inverse of loss, or a change from non-forest to forest entirely within the study period. It is expressed as either 1 (gain) or 0 (no gain).
Forests worldwide are in a state of flux, with accelerating losses in some regions and gains in others. Given the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services, quantification of global forest extent and change is needed. This map displays the forest loss during the period 2000–2018, defined as a stand-replacement disturbance, or a change from forest to non-forest state. It is expressed as either 1 (loss - in red) or 0 (no loss).